Caught Quoting or Plagiarizing?
Thursday, August 16, 2012
FOREWORD
Has Philippine Senator Tito Sotto forget quoting the part of his privilege speech regarding his anti-RH Bill stand that is why it has resulted into a controversial news regarding his speech?
LATELY :
Does he make wrong on not exactly quoting what he saying on his speech regarding the bad effects of Oral hormonal contraceptives to woman's health since digestive system and mental part of the body has connection to one another?Or the bloggers are just keen that is why Senator Sotto can not escape their critic pens though Senator Sotto may consider not to quote it but want to own the passage so as to impress the Senate on his defense against the Reproductive Health Bill?
So Now,his tactic did not work..
NOW :
SOURCE :
Sotto denies plagiarizing parts of RH bill speech
Posted at 08/16/2012 10:10 AM | Updated as of 08/16/2012 5:31 PM
MANILA, Philippines – Senate Majority Leader Vicente “Tito” Sotto III denied he plagiarized parts of his speech about the Reproductive Health (RH) bill.
Critics have compared a passage from his speech with that of a U.S. blogger called Sarah.
But Sotto said he never hid the fact that the arguments he used in his speech came from a book of Dr. Natasha McBride, who is famous for developing a concept of gut and psychology syndrome.
"Yung blogger na sinasabi nila, pareho kami ng pinagkunan eh, si Natasha Campbell-McBride. In my speech, I've always said na hindi galing sa atin ito, messenger lang ako. Bakit ko naman iku-quote ‘yung blogger, ang kinu-quote ko si Natasha McBride," he explained.
Sotto added his critics are only bringing up the issue of plagiarism because they could not answer the arguments of McBride.
"Nauubusan [sila] ng sagot sa sinasabi ko so they attack me... Sagutin niyo yung sinabi ni Natasha McBride," he insisted on his critics.
Sotto also reiterated he is in favor of a responsible parenting program but he does not see the need to put it into law. -- ANC
HUMOR
Senators like Tito Sotto should not show that they are intelligent if they are not really explicitly but rather should be true than to be political hypocrite.
Critics have compared a passage from his speech with that of a U.S. blogger called Sarah.
But Sotto said he never hid the fact that the arguments he used in his speech came from a book of Dr. Natasha McBride, who is famous for developing a concept of gut and psychology syndrome.
"Yung blogger na sinasabi nila, pareho kami ng pinagkunan eh, si Natasha Campbell-McBride. In my speech, I've always said na hindi galing sa atin ito, messenger lang ako. Bakit ko naman iku-quote ‘yung blogger, ang kinu-quote ko si Natasha McBride," he explained.
Sotto added his critics are only bringing up the issue of plagiarism because they could not answer the arguments of McBride.
"Nauubusan [sila] ng sagot sa sinasabi ko so they attack me... Sagutin niyo yung sinabi ni Natasha McBride," he insisted on his critics.
Sotto also reiterated he is in favor of a responsible parenting program but he does not see the need to put it into law. -- ANC
Bloggers react to Sotto: Bloggers LANG kami!
Posted at 08/16/2012 5:37 PM | Updated as of 08/16/2012 5:39 PM
MANILA, Philippines – Senator Vicente Sotto III’s anti-Reproductive Health Bill speech at Senate prompted negative reactions from the bill’s advocates, and allegations that parts of it were plagiarized from a US-based blogger have only fanned the flames.
In an interview on ANC’s Headstart, Sotto denied basing his speech on a blog post by Sarah Pope, and said his speech was based on a book by Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride, a neurologist known for her work with the Gut and Psychology Syndrome.
This syndrome establishes a connection between digestive and mental health. Oral hormonal contraceptives, or the Pill, McBride said, cause a bacterial imbalance in the digestive system, which is bad for the health.
“Yung blogger na sinasabi nila, pareho kami ng pinagkunan eh, si Natasha Campbell-McBride. Bakit ko naman iku-quote ‘yung blogger, ang kinu-quote ko si Natasha McBride,” Sotto said.
Bloggers and other netizens went up in arms at what they believe was a wrong move for Sotto, and also attacked his supposed belittling of one of them, as in his interview with Karen Davila, he also said, “Bakit ko naman iqu-quote ang blogger? Blogger lang iyon.”
However, other online Filipinos have also defended Sotto, saying his quote was merely taken out of context. They also said they respect the Senator, as he has a firm belief in what he is fighting for.
The alleged plagiarism has even spawned all sorts of jokes on social media, with some saying Sotto's speechwriter is his daughter Ciara, who staunchly defended her father on her Twitter account.
Todo ang pasasalamat ni Ciara Sotto sa kanyang Twitter account sa mga pumuri sa father niyang si Sen. Tito Sotto sa privilege speech niya sa Senado nu’ng Lunes tungkol sa pagiging laban niya sa Reproduction Health Bill.
Obviously, nakatanggap din ng bashers si Ciara sa account niya kaya naman sinabi niyang factual ang basehan ng ama sa masaklap ang naging karanasan sa paggamit ng asawang si Helen Gamboa ng contraceptives.
Kaya naman upang hindi maapektuhan sa negatibong tweets, block agad ang pinipindot ni Ciara na todo ang suporta rin sa pagiging anti sa RH Bill!
In an interview on ANC’s Headstart, Sotto denied basing his speech on a blog post by Sarah Pope, and said his speech was based on a book by Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride, a neurologist known for her work with the Gut and Psychology Syndrome.
This syndrome establishes a connection between digestive and mental health. Oral hormonal contraceptives, or the Pill, McBride said, cause a bacterial imbalance in the digestive system, which is bad for the health.
“Yung blogger na sinasabi nila, pareho kami ng pinagkunan eh, si Natasha Campbell-McBride. Bakit ko naman iku-quote ‘yung blogger, ang kinu-quote ko si Natasha McBride,” Sotto said.
Bloggers and other netizens went up in arms at what they believe was a wrong move for Sotto, and also attacked his supposed belittling of one of them, as in his interview with Karen Davila, he also said, “Bakit ko naman iqu-quote ang blogger? Blogger lang iyon.”
However, other online Filipinos have also defended Sotto, saying his quote was merely taken out of context. They also said they respect the Senator, as he has a firm belief in what he is fighting for.
The alleged plagiarism has even spawned all sorts of jokes on social media, with some saying Sotto's speechwriter is his daughter Ciara, who staunchly defended her father on her Twitter account.
Todo ang pasasalamat ni Ciara Sotto sa kanyang Twitter account sa mga pumuri sa father niyang si Sen. Tito Sotto sa privilege speech niya sa Senado nu’ng Lunes tungkol sa pagiging laban niya sa Reproduction Health Bill.
Obviously, nakatanggap din ng bashers si Ciara sa account niya kaya naman sinabi niyang factual ang basehan ng ama sa masaklap ang naging karanasan sa paggamit ng asawang si Helen Gamboa ng contraceptives.
Kaya naman upang hindi maapektuhan sa negatibong tweets, block agad ang pinipindot ni Ciara na todo ang suporta rin sa pagiging anti sa RH Bill!
HUMOR
Senator Sotto want to impress the Senate hoping that no one knew the passage he is saying thus not quoting it or we don't know;but now He Become DEPRESS on his Wanting to IMPRESS...ehehe..
Naging Totoo nalang sana siya..
PROPECHIZMIZ
Senators like Tito Sotto should not show that they are intelligent if they are not really explicitly but rather should be true than to be political hypocrite.
 |
| Identical Ba or Coincident? Waaaaaaaaaaaa |
